Loading

Question

MT220 Global Business

Political Economy and Economic Development

Revolution in Egypt opening case with 83 million people, Egypt is the most populous Arab state. On the face of it, Egypt made significant economic progress during the 2000s. In 2004, the government of Hosni Mubarak enacted a series of economic reforms that included trade liberalization, cuts in import tariffs, tax cuts, deregulation, and changes in investment regulations that allowed for more foreign direct investment in the Egyptian economy. As a consequence, economic growth, which had been in the 2 to 4 percent range during the early 2000s, accelerated to around 7 percent a year. Exports more than tripled, from $9 billion in 2004 to more than $29 billion by 2010. Foreign direct investment increased from $4 billion in 2004 to $11 billion in 2008, while unemployment fell from 11 percent to 8 percent.

By 2008, Egypt seemed to be displaying many of the features of other emerging economies. On Cairo’s outskirts, clusters of construction cranes could be seen where gleaming new offices were being built for companies such as Microsoft, Oracle, and Vodafone. Highways were being constructed, hypermarkets were opening their doors, and sales of private cars quadrupled between 2004 and 2008. Things seemed to be improving.

Appearances can be deceiving. Underneath the surface, Egypt had major economic and political problems. Inflation, long a concern, remained high at 12.8 percent in 2010. As the global economic crisis took hold in 2008–2009, Egypt saw many of its growth drivers slow. In 2008, tourism brought some $11 billion into the country, accounting for 8.5 percent of gross domestic product, but it fell sharply in 2009 and 2010. Remittances from Egyptian expatriates working overseas, which amounted to $8.5 billion in 2008, declined sharply as construction projects in the Gulf, where many of them worked, were cut back or shut down. Earnings from the Suez Canal, which stood at $5.2 billion in 2008, declined by 25 percent in 2009 as the volume of world shipping slumped in the wake of the global economic slowdown.

Moreover, Egypt remained a country with a tremendous gap between the rich and the poor. Some 44 percent of Egyptians are classified as poor or extremely poor; the average wage is less than $100 a month. Some 2.6 million people are so destitute that their entire income cannot cover their basic food needs.

Page 60The gap between rich and poor, when coupled with a sharp economic slowdown, became a toxic mix. Nominally a stable democracy with a secular government, Egypt was, in fact, an autocratic state. By 2011, President Hosni Mubarak had been in power for more than a quarter of a century. The government was highly corrupt. Mubarak and his family reportedly amassed personal fortunes amounting to billions of U.S. dollars, most of which were banked outside Egypt. Although elections were held, they were hardly free and fair. Opposition parties were kept in check by constant police harassment, their leaders often jailed on trumped up charges.

Given all of this, it is perhaps not surprising that in January 2011 popular discontent spilled over into the streets. Led by technologically savvy young Egyptians—who harnessed the power of the Internet and social network media such as Facebook and Twitter to organize mass demonstrations—hundreds of thousands of Egyptians poured into Cairo’s Tahrir Square and demanded the resignation of the Mubarak government. There they stayed, their numbers only growing over time. For weeks, Mubarak refused to step down, while the demonstrations gained momentum and Egypt’s powerful military establishment stood on the sidelines. Foreign governments, including the Obama administration in the United States, long one of Egypt’s most important Western allies, joined the chorus of voices calling for Mubarak to resign. In the end, his position became untenable and he stepped down on February 11, 2011. The Egyptian military took the reins of power, vowing to do so for a short time while it organized a transition to democratic elections in the fall of 2011. In March 2011, Egyptians voted on a set of proposed constitutional amendments designed to pave the way for the elections in late 2011. This was the first time in six decades that Egyptians had been offered a free choice on any public issues.

Does this mean democracy is now firmly established in Egypt? That is still not clear. Moderate Islamists from the Muslim Brotherhood won the most seats in the country’s first democratic election, but they now find themselves with the difficult task of negotiating a handover of real power from the military to parliament. To complicate matters, there are groups within Egypt that accuse the Brotherhood of selling out the revolution and cutting a backroom deal with the military. The military, for its part, seems reluctant to hand over power to the Brotherhood, and protestors are once more taking to the streets. The future seems highly uncertain. The country has no real experience with democratic institutions. Five years from now Egypt may resemble Turkey, a state whose secular model of government many Egyptians say they would like to see adopted in their country. But there is also a chance that either the military or a radicalized Islamic party might impose a more totalitarian government.  

Sources: “Will the Dam Burst?” The Economist, September 13, 2008, pp. 31–34; Y. Zhongwen and C. Gongzheng, “Egypt’s Economy Slowing Down Due to Global Financial Crisis,” Xinhua news agency, www.xinhuanet.com, April 5, 2009; D. C. Kurtzer, “Where Is Egypt Headed?” Spero Forum, April 4, 2009, www.speroforum.com; “Yes They Can,” The Economist, March 26, 2011, pp. 55–56; and “A Long March,” The Economist, February 18, 2012, pp. 49–51.

 

CASE DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

Political risks in Egypt seem to be increasing again, and the country seems to be retreating from democracy, largely due to intervention by the military. As a manager in an international business, how would the current turmoil and political uncertainty in Egypt influence your investment decisions, and what does this mean for the future of the Egyptian economy?

 

 

MT220 Global Business question.docx
Top Reviews

Solution Preview

Introduction

In the previous chapter, we described how countries differ with regard to their political systems, economic systems, and legal systems. In this chapter, we build upon this material to explain how these differences in political economy influence 

This question has been solved!
OR
OR
Back To Top
#BoostYourGrades

Want a plagiarism free solution of this question ?

EYWELCOME30
100% money back guarantee
on each order.